UPDATE: DNC Fraud Lawsuit ! ! !

While many in media will not cover this case, it is still ongoing. Candidates running for office under the DNC banner certainly can’t discuss it and even those who are claiming to be progressives linked to the DNC can’t talk about it either.  So here are the facts: The DNC admitted to Giving Hillary Clinton and overwhelming amount of support to defeat Bernie Sanders. What that support looked like and how it materialized is still under investigation, concealment, and denial. All these factors also exist in the race between Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Tim Canova. The criminal act of destroying ballots have yet to result in any criminal charges.  Here is an article on that. 

https://ivn.us/2018/10/31/debbie-wasserman-schultz-danger-losing-seat/ 

The nation-wide DNC primary used funds derived from State and Federal taxes for execution.  The primary is legally bound to be fair, or neutral as defined by the US Constitution. Fair elections are the law.  By legal requirement, a voter must declare a party to participate in a primary. This declaration excludes ones’ ability to participate in any other primary. This creates a contract by exclusivity and is legally binding. It can result in voter fraud charges which are a felony any time a federal seat is on the ballot. To date no State or Federal agency has asked for its money to be returned or sought relief for the DNC’s biased handling of the Primary. Their taxpayers paid for the primary under the assumption that the election was actually an election, as law requires it be.

So, the DNC claims as a private entity it can pick the PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE without any input from voters.  The DNC has testified that it actively worked to make Hillary the nominee. It has also been proven that the same DNC actively worked to elevate Candidate Trump into a favorable lead position.

The case was dismissed and an appeal was granted. Oral arguments to move forward have been heard. As of this writing we do not have the decision. Request for live steaming these proceedings where denied and the audio can be found here: http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings?title=&field_oar_case_name_value=wilding&field_oral_argument_date_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Byear%5D=&field_oral_argument_date_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Bmonth%5D=

The judge asks about the nature of injury.  The injury is that the lost of faith of the law of fair elections. Democracy its self is injured.  The very fabric of democracy which is dependent on voting and is intrinsic to the peaceful of transfer of power. Listen to the interaction. It is fascinating that the DNC claiming to be a private organization can sue others for a reduction in their campaign dollars, yet it holds no responsibility to its self to have devalued itself by rigging the election for Hillary.

On tape the judge questions that any person who joins a party that it should have a fiduciary responsibility. Why is that questionable? All organizations which collect money have a fiduciary responsibility to do with the money as publicly presented in its bylaws and filing with the federal government for a tax ID number.

The Judge refers to precedence. At no time has a case of this nature been substantiated. There is no precedence. While rigging has been going on, no one knows how long or how many candidates have been cheated as was Bernie.  The system propagates the belief that one should accept a loss graciously and did Hillary. Hillary tried to insist that Candidate Trump concede in the face of her certain win… which did not happen. Even the President of the United States  Barack Obama publicly claimed an election could not be rigged.  Magically overnight millions of dollars more than she had to campaign with flowed to Jill Stein. Stein then called for recounts in states which the Hillary losses were the smallest. That recount effort revealed more fraudulent votes for Hillary and was dropped from the media coverage and ended abruptly. The status of that money can be found here: https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-happened-to-jill-steins-recount-millions . While the 7 million dollars raised is a serious issue it pales in comparison to the fact Green Party members have no idea what is going on. Candidates running Green have gotten almost no support nationally.

Everything about modern elections has given the advantage to the two major parties.  People have no idea how difficult running for office has been made for an independent or any candidate not supported by the local two-party system.  They also forget that the two parties have elected positions on the ballot as delegates, some even produce judges.  

All elected positions have a fiduciary responsibility.  Why would it be a question if the organizations they report to has that same responsibility toward legal, ethic, moral, and financial responsibilities?  It seems just as the lawyer for the DNC would not admit in the affirmative anything in the hypothetical offered by the judge, a court would also be hesitant to verbally paint itself into a corner.

This case could be an estimated 900 million dollars in damages. This is a civil case. Criminal charges for actual election fraud have not been filed. The public keeps hearing the tern voter fraud which is on purpose. Election fraud is committed by individuals in charge of elections. Voters fraud is when a voter individually casts an illegal ballot. A case of a voter who unknowingly voted illegally is here sentence 5 years: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/03/30/texas-woman-sentenced-to-5-years-in-prison-for-voting-while-on-probation/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d395690d0bcd

Here is the contrast of another voter who knowingly voted twice got two years probation: https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2017/07/07/iowa-woman-charged-voting-twice-trump-pleads-guilty/459718001/ 

Many voters believe the clams of political organizations and give money based on those claims. How is it different from any marketing of any product? The fact that it is very different in execution is indisputable.  No elected official can be forced to represent their constituency it is legally required by oath.  They have sworn to do so to a higher authority as the oath of office records.  Accepting money for preferential treatment and access is bribery and is illegal. It is that simple.

What is on trial here is not just if the DNC can collect money and disregard the voter. It is a question of legal obligation to present any claims with a responsibility to follow through.  It will be interesting to see how the courts rule.  Many of the seats at this level are appointed. No appointment happens without first winning the offices and thus a majority through a public election.  Elections remain our means to remove corruption from power. That is why all the fuss about elections being fair is valid.  The public is supposed to have the legal capability and right to remove any ineffective representative. That right and that choice is on trial.

I am Allen J. Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption.

Something your family should already know....

The nation is at a crossroads that actually has no fork. It is a road that only goes in one direction.  If we chose to stay on this road those who have kept us on it will gain everything they want. They will gain everything they desire to take from all of us. What does that mean? It means the real problem is that if Trump is guilty of EVERY single thing as accused and we obliterate every Russian from the universe we will still have the same Americans rigging elections who are in court right now claiming it is their right to do so.  People do not know that at this very moment the DNC Fraud lawsuit exists. The appeal is still going to oral argument in Sept 2018. That is  this year. Here is the link:

 https://ivn.us/2018/01/11/court-order-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-continue/  

Fact: This case does not come up on Google search with the importance of its potential impact as it should. What does come up, is the dismissal. The main  source of information regarding it is restricted to Facebook. What does that say about the mainstream media and its responsibility to accurately and objectively cover events? This is showing this nation is in real trouble when it comes to information being controlled to drive an opinion, agenda, and perception. 

The real issue is there is a difference between meddling in an election and rigging an election.  When meddling occurs the election itself still happens.  When rigging occurs, no actual election takes place and voters are merely TOLD an election has taken place. It is fraud. It is a selection not an election.  That is treason when it involves a Presidential race and a felony whenever a federal seat is on the ballot.

Information is a commodity and it always has been. If the people knew the truth about wars, how they get started, and who profits from wars we would have an entirely different political structure. All the players would be different. Families with long lines of being in office would cease to exist.

I don't say the things I say as a Dem or a Republican.  I say them as an American.  Those who would rather blow up the planet rather than share it with the rest of us are the real criminals.  Many have been tried as war criminals in world courts and found guilty.  They are in the US hiding from those international charges but in plain sight. 

It was never about one man who is President.  The checks and balances built into our system ensure that.  Its about those who are in positions which nullify those checks and balances with corruption.  We must remember this is Trump's first time holding any office.  No one knows what a job entails or requires until they are actually in the seat.  One can imagine all day and prepare as much as possible but no one knows the reality of any job until they are doing it.  He entered a world of politics and corruption that the entire world does not even believe exists.

A neophyte is dangerous. A neophyte is dangerous to the corruption, the system, and everything that was established before they enter the doors. Either one does not know what is going on, how things actually work, or has no idea who really does what.

Many fail to understand how so many lawyers who swear an oath to represent clients end  up being politicians. It is the most egregious of all social detriments in the history of public or private industry. The exploitation of loop holes, making laws they don't follow, changing law for profit, and continuously working to become a judge to protect their illegal endeavors is the darkest side of being in law.  There are people who serve with honor and distinction in the legal profession. Those who are breaking the law are appointing judges.

 This is not rocket science.  That is not an insult, its a fact. Rocket Science demands a certain amount of intelligence and at the very least an grasp of mathematics. Certainly those elected to make budgets should be able to add and subtract enough to responsibly pay bills and track the money coming in.  They are very proficient in taking money and adding up campaign donations. This speaks to why our education is repeatedly underfunded and our national ability to make war increases exponentially.  It is easy to fool people who trust and believe what you have been telling them and showing them.  They don't get to peak behind the curtain or examine the other hand placed behind the backs of those performing tricks.

 These concerns are valid.  The nation is being reported to have a stance that the majority of Americans are ill-informed about. You don't wash one half of your dirty underwear and put them back on claiming its a pair of underwear so you can wash one side at a time. That's nasty, more over, that's just stupid. So, why do we keep getting sucked into thinking that way when it comes to politics?

 The talk of deep-state and all the things that comes with politics are real. We must NEVER forget that there are a handful of people who are in fact, representing us to the world.  They are not really representing us in the true principles of representation. While we can all agree that Jesus lived we may not all agree on who he was, or is.  The accounts of his life prove one simple fact.  He conducted himself as a representative in the purest of forms.  His claims to be about his father's business at all times are noteworthy and famous throughout ALL TIME.

 When you are a representative, you say and do what you are told by those who sent you. Many think the Representatives in Congress work for them. Then, there are those who know Congress works for them. People represent things and others in our daily lives constantly. It is a element of our existence. We do know those you pay to represent you better well do it or get fired. So, why don't we think that way when we hire or elect people for public office? News flash: they are representing who pays them. They are representing who pays them the most, not the salary. It is impossible mathematically to become a multi-millionaire in 3-5 years on an annual salary of 170K.  This mathematical impossibility exists for all of mankind, not just if you are Republican or DEM. 

 Oh, and an update on the case we are working on.  We will be in the US Supreme Court in August 2018. Yes, that is in a few days. We have been in court for over a year now and there is still NO major media covering our story. Why do you think that is?  We who know the truth are far less dangerous than those who don't, because we can't stop all the corruption alone. you can ceck our twitter feed and see who we constantly send tweets to about this case.  Yes it is all media outlets and Congress. Although, to be fair Congress already knows because EVERY seated member is a DEFENDANT on this case.  Wait, did the person running for office in your district tell you that this case makes every law they make subject to challenge in a a court of law? Bet they'll say they didn't know. Your response should be, "why not? you are a defendant in a case going to the supreme court, right?"

Our case is on pacer.  Of course the only place you can find proof of it you have to pay to access it. That's another thing that must change. Here is the link to our case but google won't return any results:

 https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/21312877/LAVERGNE_et_al_v_UNITED_STATES_HOUSE_OF_REPRESENTATIVES_et_al 

Keep in mind this case entered court on standing of NET NEUTRALITY. Why is that important? It is very important because major corporations have claimed to support an open and free internet, without censorship, throttling, tiers of speed, or paid levels of access to information. These claims of supporting us having an open net are EMPTY.  This case is being buried because it guarantees the net stays open and free.  They don't really want that. What they want is to be able to control what you see and when you see it, thereby controlling what you buy and who you buy it from.

In conclusion, I ask you to contemplate the following: Are they really willing to blow up the planet just to make more money? What’s the endgame? Is it to cause a war so that Trillions of people die just so they can have more?  When you look at the fact that those who have the most and the best money can buy, are not satisfied with luxury, opulence, or restricted access it is disturbing.  I find it really disturbing that it is not enough to have the best of everything. Really consider this point. Please, before it is too late for all of us who have less.

I am Allen J Cannon . I am Anti-Corruption.

Have a great day, please feel free to share this article.

Thank you for your attention.

Here are more links if you want more more information.

https://justnform.com/ 

https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306   

Approval of Purging Voter rolls while the Illegal Purge in Rigging The PRESIDENTIAL election is ignored.

The headline boldly proclaims: Supreme Court allows Ohio and other state voter purges

This is the link to the headline in the Chicago Tribune:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-supreme-court-ohio-voter-purge-20180611-story.html 

Since when does the absence of exercising ones Constitutional right give the elite the authority to take it away? The people are so distracted by party, race, and the trappings of self-promotion that they don’t see they will eventually lose everything.

The people must learn the breadcrumbs left by anyone other that yourself is not a path. It is bait. When you leave bread crumbs it is with intention and purpose. Follow the trail at your own peril. Law has become a way to make what’s wrong legal. That is not what the system was designed to do. It is how it has been used. We are witnessing the convergence of that practice with the reality of its impact.

One can connect the dots without falling into the baited trap. See it for what it is. Why is there no coverage on Pizzagate? Do they think we have forgotten? Why is there no coverage on the children the Federal government lost track of? Why, in light of the children not being located, are there children being separated in camps? It is a fact that pedophiles have a system that has been operating at the highest levels with the protection of the highest levels.  While our basic rights are being eroded, people continue in the futile exercise of blaming one party or another.

If EVERYTHING is a matter of law and based on legislation, why is the biggest case to enter court in our lifetime being blacked out of the media? This case I am referring to is  Lavergne vs Us House of Representatives. Here is the link: http://wethepeoplercominginnovember.blogspot.com/2018/05/breaking-news-with-real-breaking-news.html 

   This case calls into question and highlights the lack of representation of ALL Americans to the law making process and points out the very act of making laws is in of itself currently illegal.  The authority to make law is not the complicated process that it is reported to be. Simplified, it is an idea that is voted on and made law. The question we should all be asking is, why do the same people get to make the law all the time. Clearly the laws they make are not benefiting the entire nation.

As of this writing there are 435 people making law who are legally obligated to represent us and our rights. They are morally and legally obligated to vote for us, the people’s interest. That number 435 is less than 7% of what it is legally obligated to be. That number is legally, by the Constitution, supposed to be  over 6200 based on 2010 census numbers.  That is why they are pushing law to control who votes. By purging the rolls they draw down the number of people who can vote.  It is like only selecting those who will agree with you and your objective and claiming it is the best course of action because you decided to only count supporters in your assessment of validity.

The problem still lies not in how many people vote but in how the votes are counted and what those elected do. It is not their responsibility to only do what voters ask. It is their responsibility to do what is in the best interest of ALL citizens, not just those who go to the polls or write donation checks.  If a person chooses not to exercise their right to vote they still have the same rights as those who vote. It is consistent with employees having rights even though they are not a part of the union.

When I served as an elected official I made it clear that I served at the pleasure of ALL our residents, not just the ones who voted for me. I no longer had a vote because in being their representative I became their voice. It became my responsibility to do what they ask, protect them from the elite, corrupt, and criminal enterprises that may be attempted. It was also my responsibility to inform them of those things that were not in their best interest and hold accountable those who worked against the public good for personal gain. There is no greater measure of trust than allowing a representative to go on you behalf, in your stead, to carry your message.

Purging rolls is being supported while the illegal purging took place and no one has gone to jail for breaking the law. The law is being used to make that which was previously illegal, now legal.  The further disenfranchisement must be seen for what it is. Why would any entity of responsible public trust reduce the number of voices to be heard? Why would anyone in the role of a representative of the public, knowing full well the number of people who vote is already drastically inconsistent with the number of citizens, reduce access? It is about control. It is not about representation. Not pnly do they desire to control law and its creation, but its application as well.

Those who break the law are being protected by those sworn to uphold the law. The corruption is at an all-time high and visible to the point that it is confusing who did what and when. All we know for sure is that all the accomplices must be removed from their places of influence and held accountable.

Lying to Congress used to be a professional death sentence. Why? It is because lying to Congress was lying to the representatives of the people, which is in effect lying to the people. The truth is that the representatives have been lying to the people so long that when a liar sits before Congress and lies they won’t take action because those who pay them to lie to us will just buy another liar.

I can’t over express the importance of voting. We take the time to seek the approval of others or just to let our voices and choices be heard on social media platforms CONSTANTLY. Why not take the time to make sure you voices can be heard where it really matters. Where is that? That is on the level of government that can and will silence your voices and remove your choices.

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption.

Breaking the news with real breaking news ! ! !

 Every facet of life is tied to politics. This is not a statement that anyone can deny. What we are allowed to say, where we live, how we shop, the information we share, the information we are given, and what it emphasized is a matter of politics. Legislation outlaws baggy pants, no shoes no shirt service, bans on athletic attire, and business dress codes are founded and backed by legislation. The sale of items, the permission to own and operate shops, and where a business can be located are legislated. Zones, variances convents, and permits control what may be done in and on one’s property. Access to schools are controlled by districts who operate based on law.

 People need to start the discussion in churches, fraternities, and in every social network platform the change that is about to occur.  This is vitally important to the fabric of life in America. Soon the shift of who has that say will occur. The concentrated populated areas will control representation in the House of Representatives.  Gerrymandering will be broken as will the control lobbyist have over the House.

How is this possible? The case of LaVergne Vs US House of Representatives is moving toward oral argument. This monumental case establishes undeniable proof that the urban legend of Article the First is real. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment  This once thought to have been an unratified amendment to the Constitution, has been proven to be authentic and valid.

The very first protection offered to the masses by the founding fathers was to ensure that the people remain accurately represented in the law-making process. The link explains what the “proposed” amendment was to be. There are many details that went into proving this has actually been law for over 100 years. I will spare readers the details but will state that the finest law scholars have examined the findings and agree.

What does this all mean? It means that as the population grew the US House of Representatives should have grown. Currently there are 435, noting that it was actually lowered from 437.  These seats are often controlled by county level politicians in gerrymandered districts. This finding and court case should be on every major news network in the country. It is not.  This means that highly populated areas will get their own representation. Major urban centers having excess of 50,000 people will get at least 2 Representatives. Based on 2010 census data the count of members should be over 6,000. That number will rise after the 2020 census is complete.  Census taking is a direct step in determining the number of seats in the House.

Due to the recent issues of election rigging, gerrymandering, altered ballots, and the inaction of Congress to ensure valid elections occur the information of this game changing storm coming should be on everyone’s lips. A few links are provided to substantiate the current flaws in the system as we know it.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41850798

https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2017/08/30/federal-court-determines-wasserman-rigged-election-for-hillary-and-says-%E2%80%9Cso-what%E2%80%9D/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/20271/court-admits-dnc-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-joseph-curl

Despite the common held belief that few even knew the DNC were getting sued many still do not know the case won appeal and is in court right now:  https://ivn.us/2018/01/11/court-order-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-continue/   As of the writing of the article. Updates can be found here: https://twitter.com/dncfraudlawsuit?lang=en  Not the link is a twitter account which means information can go out immediately if need arises.

So, what can you do? For immediate action you can begin sharing this information with all you know. All friends and family should know it. There are deeper writings and video posted to fully understand the case of LaVergne Vs US House of Representatives on this blog: https://wethepeoplercominginnovember.blogspot.com/

There is a plan to remove those responsible for ignoring the rigging of the Presidential election and to deal with those who participated in that rigging. Please understand that we only have a valid reason to oppose a winner if the winner is determined fairly. When the fair competition is compromised we have a responsibility to address that failing in the system because no legitimate winner has emerged.

 There is no such thing as a half-rigged election. There is no election as long as a winner is predetermined. That is a selection.  There are people who are tasked with the responsibility of representing the millions of people who can not come to meetings for what ever reason. Usually the reasons are distance and the number of constituents involved. It is necessary to have Representatives to get anything done.  What is not necessary or even ethical, is for those representatives to ignore the constituents and stake holders.

Consider this fact.  Many of the office holders are from legal career backgrounds.  It is a crime, as a lawyer, to fail to represent a client to the best of one’s ability. So, there is no excuse for anyone having that background to fail to understand the concept of representation. Fact: Elected office comes with a fiduciary responsibility.

According to CityEthics org, “One reason that government ethics is described in terms of obligations is that government officials have a fiduciary duty or obligation toward the community for which they work (and which, in some cases, elected them). Government officials have a special obligation toward the community, usually referred to as “the public,” that is unlike any other obligation. Government ethics deals with conflicts between this special obligation and an official’s other obligations.”

The public has been indoctrinated into accepting corruption and the selective enforcement of the law.  It should not be an acceptable expectation that politicians are corrupt.  The insinuation that to even be in politics one must become corrupt or accept corruption is ridiculous.  

It is time to end this cycle. It starts with us. As we take the house we do so in the interest of the public good. Those who represent our communities will be from those communities and no longer have to have millions at their disposal to run for office. With the limitation of 50,000 constituents each Representative will have to face the people they have been ignoring.

 What is next? We the People of the United States must own our destiny. We must not only push for, but be uncompromising when confronting those who have held the truth from us for so long. We must hold them accountable by vowing to never vote for them again. Yes, it is that simple. The House is our house. It was meant for us. It was not meant to be handed down as a family heirloom or bartered away for personal favors or access to the Congressional floor to bribe our representation.

The source documents of this case can be found by using the following link: https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306

Please know that all we have done this because we have no other choice.  This is not about left, right, red, or blue. This is about right and wrong. The corruption has reached a degree of intolerable proportions and is risking the fatal collapse of our nation. Policy is the action one takes and the decided course of action deemed acceptable to those in the position to enforce it. Our policy is to stand against corruption no matter the source.  Corruption is no longer acceptable nor can we afford to tolerate it any longer. In light of this evidence we can say platforms are ineffective and meaningless as our list of unresolved issue grow and life becomes more difficult for hard working Americans who are reduced to just struggling to survive and abide by the law.

I am Allen J Cannon, and I am Anti-Corruption.

INTERVIEW: Allen J. Cannon on U.S. Constitution and Landmark Lawsuit Inv...

Here is the interview before we made it to the US Supreme Court Docket Number 18-290.

Here is the link to the docket search on the US Supreme Court site:

 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-290.html

Update the case:  The Supreme Court sent the case back to the Appellant Division of the lower court claiming not to have Jurisdiction.  This case is still ongoing.--AJC

What really happened when Bernie Sanders went south.... a response !

This is a response to the article Bernie Sanders in the Deep South by Brianna Joy Gray The link is below.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/what-really-happened-when-bernie-sanders-went-to-mississippi.html

It would be difficult to cover all the things one could say about the Black vote in a single article but, this attempt is not meant to accomplish that mission. When we look at the loss of over 1000 seats by the Democrats, one thing is a fact. The seats have been lost.  The loss of Hillary actually made that fact public knowledge. There is more to the story.

The Black community is a complex living breathing entity. It has varying levels of understanding, education, and economics. A consistent theme could be the physical decline often noted while a parallel effort to improve exists.  It is an economy and environment of struggle. People who live inside are not all trying to get out. They are not all trying to sell drugs for a living, walk around strapped, or dropping out of school to hang on corners.

While those things happen in Black communities the foundations of education, living wage employment, and personal effort exist but are under constant attack.  Local politics have filled elected offices with ineffective politicians while simultaneously growing community leaders trying to make a difference.  These things brings us to logical questions. Why have things not gotten better?  Why are these communities in constant states of decline, debt, and often blatant corruption? The answer is politics.

A deeper examination of the Black community often reveals career politicians who have long careers and are often democrats.  The offices are usually filled with establishment candidates and no local advocates usually break through primaries.  It’s as if the people on the ground, the advocates, never make it past primaries and often rack up losses trying. These losses become seemingly legitimized as futile, as the issues raised in campaigns just keep getting worse. Fact is proven by watching and urban film made in the 1980’s.  The issues are still the same and in many instances have worsened.

In the article Bernie is reported to address the fact that the Democratic party has not met the needs of the black community, as a business model. Here is an excerpt from the article:

“The business model, if you like, of the Democratic Party for the last 15 years or so has been a failure,” said Sanders. “People sometimes don’t see that because there was a charismatic individual named Barack Obama. He was obviously an extraordinary candidate, brilliant guy. But behind that reality, over the last ten years, Democrats have lost about 1,000 seats in state legislatures all across this country.”

Is that shade? One would have to step into the sun to really feel the heat of the truth.  Here it comes.  Many black people hold President Obama as a hero and a role model.  I was as proud as any black person who witnessed something I never thought I would see in my lifetime. That is a Black President.  It was a major accomplishment and our families could often be seen crying in disbelief and joy during his swearing in.  In other parts of the nation there was just swearing.

The election of President Barack Obama is what made Donald trump possible. I will give you time to grasp your pearls and breathe. Now follow plain logic if you will.  I and many did not know Hillary was as bad as she was until I hung on every word of then Senator Obama. I did not stop there. I began to dig on my own, certain that if this man was telling the truth he would not be alive long enough to have it known worldwide.

So, I dug. I did research. I found that he was actually being polite or maybe his articulation came off that way, but the facts were enlightening and horrifying. I could not get my mind around how honest he was about how bad she was for this nation.  The level of corruption he spoke of and was also referenced by Mrs. Obama was mind blowing. The link below reveals some things that now make far more sense than they did when we first heard them. Frame all words thinking articulation does not equal truth.  We hear the eloquent words. Some are impressed by how words flow never realizing which direction the current leads.

See the exchanges here: 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/01/28/the-10-nastiest-moments-of-the-obama-hillary-primary-video/?utm_term=.62f210b3c2a2

If we are to frame all the things said about both candidates by the candidates themselves in the Clinton-Obama race in a narrow perspective of them both being honest about each other a different picture emerges. If we just do our own research to verify what was said it changes what we believe. If we combine those words with what actually happened, not by what we believe, we see how President Trump won. As a caveat, I am not a President Trump fan.  There is something far more dangerous about a person who does not fully realize what one has until it is destroyed, lost or abused. We pray for him because the nation is now by sworn oath his responsibility.

One of my assessments of President Obama is based in the fact that I believed what he said about Mrs. Clinton as did many. Given that fact no one would vote for her. I would have never hired her for anything. I did not understand why he would. If he was certainly good enough to convince me how bad she was I am certain he knew more than he told us.

I admit I was naive.  It was not until Hillary ran again that all she did while empowered by the office President Obama gave her that we learned how bad she really was.  As a military Veteran I believe that the top is responsible. The top holds the power of accountability and responsibility.  Therein lies the rub, or bern.

Many can speak of accountability but rarely have the power to make and hold those violating law accountable for their actions. That is not an opinion. That is a fact. Another fact is that if one has the power and does not use it they are guilty of the infraction, violation, betrayal, or crime by being complicit.

Previously, I mentioned the Black community as a complex living entity. It thrives by what it is fed. Both negative and positive grows to maturity based on its diet.  It does not have fully viable food, information, or power. Things in each category just mentioned are the best and worse humans have ever known.  

As Bernie knows the DNC admitted to felony election fraud in court I can question his desire to act on his power of accountability and his authenticity.  As a member of the Senate he has spoken about Russian hacking the election. The issue’s problem is evidence and a DNC confession to crime exists in official court documents of felony election fraud. Bernie has the power as a Senator as do ALL Senators and Representatives to call for an investigation into the confession and hold those people responsible for crimes. Why this is important is covered in another blog here: 

http://wethepeoplercominginnovember.blogspot.com/2017/08/all-tax-payers-must-focus-on-what-is.html

The logic chain should make the following connections: 

1. President Obama was right about Hillary in 08, 
2. President Obama hired Hillary
3. Hillary established unsecured server, uses position as SoS to collect billions while breaking national security protocols which she knew existed as Flotus, and Senator.
4. Hillary buys DNC and pays for Steele dossier 
5. Hillary destroys evidence in Federal indictment case
6. DNC exposed for felony election fraud, DNC chair resigns and is hired by Hillary
7. Bernie gets cheated, millions of Bernie supporters get purged from Dem rolls and delegates witness collusion to rig the nomination first hand
8. Bill and lynch meet on a plane Hillary is let go by Comey
9. Investigation on Hillary reopened
10. President Obama and all Dems campaign for Hillary including Bernie.
11. Hillary, President Obama and DNC expects all cheated voters to support her based on being Black and loyal to Obama, hate and fear of Trump.
12. Trump wins

There is a book written by Hillary blaming everyone for her loss.  Those 1000 seats lost did not happen overnight. It took an epiphany by voters to see the promises made have not been kept.  Those promises were not kept by politicians and parties. Seeing the truth of the elected responsibility to have at least made an effort to keep those promises prompted voters to withdraw support.

As a voter I would have never known Hillary as the person I see her as today, had it not been for President Obama.  Even as Commander in Chief I hold him responsible for Benghazi. As I said, authority and accountability start at the top. He eventually fired Hillary or she left. We may never know which is fact.  The facts we do know are that had he never hired her she would not have had access to secure emails, decision authority in Benghazi, or a position in the State Department to monetize for personal gain. We can't say for sure if Russia would still own 20% of US Uranium, or if she would have the money to buy the DNC. I doubt it.

So were the voters to actually see the logic behind this presentation I would offer this sentiment. We the people will not give up or give in. Truth and facts are the most precious commodity available.  We cannot fix things we do not know are wrong or are afraid to face. Disappointment happens.  When we learn the truth, we are often disappointed. It is nothing wrong with changing to get better.  We have witnessed our hope and the very change we seek used against us. We have learned and are trying to teach all to verify facts and seek truth.

We can no longer trust those who have a platform to raise awareness but fail to carry the full truth with them. Charisma is something Bernie knows something about. How to deal with the DNC and election fraud are lessons he still has yet to learn.  As for what happens in the Black community, I have this to say.

We take the bitter with the sweet. We have homes and the streets. Blame and game is all around. We empowered silence, and sound. To go up you must be down or figure out a way around that which will grind you to dust. We trust, sometimes more than we should and sometimes not enough. We aspire to become while some settle for what is. Every day we define the word "ENOUGH".  We either don't have enough, which we make enough, have enough, or have taken enough that we can't take anymore.  Enough is the concept the wealthy can never understand because it all can never belong to just one man. The world is often surprised at what we become without admitting it’s because we have made it past everything designed to turn us to dust.  

The Black community is alive.  That is a fact. Just ask the makers of Black Panther. 

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption

Can you name the most important piece of information in Government RIGHT NOW!

Many still do not believe the case of LaVergne Vs Us House Of Representatives is real. Despite the fact that this case has been in court since April of 20017. ( https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2017cv00793/186187 ). It is not our fault that more people do not know what this case means or of its existence.  Something this important has existed for almost a year and a march that took place for one day is covered all over the world. One would be wise to wonder how that could be possible.

I submit for your consideration that the deepest connected legal minds in the country hired by the most powerful people in the country have not managed to get this case thrown out on a technicality. 

To make this abundantly clear. This case has, on one, side FIVE regular guys. On the other opposing side, is every state Attorney General for all 50 states of the United States of America, and attorneys who represent ALL the members of the House, the US Senate, The President, The Vice President and the Secretary of the US Chamber of Commerce.  The litigants makes this newsworthy all by itself.  Five guys against all of their legal prowess, meanwhile the public is distracted by stories of pets, beauty tips, vacations, and the lifestyles of the rich and famous.

What makes this story NOT newsworthy? Certainly, if it was “Frivolous” they would have found a way to end this quickly. People have said it would never happen.  They may have meant we would never get this far. People said we were crazy.  They never read the evidence.  Where are we as a society when we just accept that corruption will do as it pleases?  Those who have no hope, rely on those of us who do.  We who have hope that justice exists, and the law actually means something have never stopped hoping.

Please allow me to impart a bit of enlightenment.  There is a case named Lavergne V Bryson. It took place in NJ. The judge in the case dismissed the case. The case is the type of case where a three judge panel would have to convene to dismiss the case on merit. A single judge could determine the presiding court did not have jurisdiction, and refer the case to an appropriate court.  In the case mentioned a single judge dismissed the case based on merit. When it happened of course those who brought the case were upset. It was a clear miscarriage of the law. In fact, it was wrong. 

During the Lavergne V House case the attorneys of several States and the Federal attorney argued that one of the plaintiffs should be removed. This is a measure called collateral estoppel.  Not only did it not apply in this case, but it opened the case of LaVergne V Bryson back up revealing the issue of improper dismissal.  Keep in mind all the plaintiffs in this case are Pro se. The best the highest paid trained minds could come up with was to try to throw one of the plaintiffs off?

The sheer fact that we are all Pro se (that means we are NOT attorneys and do not have lawyers representing us), is NEWS… yes BIG NEWS. So, why is this not being reported when celebrity relationships and corruption are in the headlines EVERY day?  It is not that media does not know. You can look at my TL on twitter  @AJC4Others and see how many times I have contacted them all about this case. I often place this case on something THEY tweeted!

For those who say 6000 members in the House is too many, I offer this. One elected person authorized by the Constitution speaking on the behalf of millions but selling that voice to the highest bidder is NOT working.  It does not work in the Oval Office, head of the FBI, head of the Unions, or in the case of any department head.  The constituency is supposed to remove those who sell their influence. That is how it is designed to work. The limit placed on the size of their constituency is painstakingly designed to limit the power of one person. No one state can run the country, especially not now. 

In the light of felony election fraud there is not a single member of Congress who is not guilty of the most egregious offence possible in public office. They violated the public trust and undermined the very process which makes ELECTING a President LEGAL and binding.  ALL incumbents are guilty of that. Any State could have challenged the election results through their representation in the Senate. You want to support a Senator? Ask them. Ask them why no member of the Senate or the House of Representatives called for an official investigation to rigging the election. The Rigging by the DNC, which the DNC admitted it in court and claimed it was their right to do so as a private organization.

Why are we bombarded with the narrative that Russia influenced the election by Facebook ads when Facebook filtered most anti-Hillary content and censored accounts which did not support her?  Why is Facebook is not being investigated? Why is Google is not being investigated in its role in manipulating search results? This is what 6000 new members in the House of Representatives will fix. These new members can, and will call for and conduct investigations WITH OUTCOMES that will lock up criminals, those taking bribes, and lock up their cronies. Do you remember that 3 day Government shutdown? Their lawyers got a 30-day extension from it. They are running out of time and excuses.

For those who don't get it, think it will make things worse, or have made their living from selling influence it does not matter what you think. What matters is this is ALREADY LAW.  It is already law. We all know ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ask any judge.

This 6000 plus membership will be comprised of US. For the first time in modern history we will have real representation.  Elected office will no longer be a family heirloom to be passed to offspring and college pals. It is time to return ethics, honor, service, and our voices back to where they belong.  We must spread the word of this because they will distract the public and spin this so many ways you won’t know what to do… or believe.

There is no need for all these Representatives to even live in Washington. Many companies and the Federal government have employees who work from home. Secure connections exist and work. It is why breaking a secure net, taking data from a secure net, and altering a secure net is a CRIME.  We have the technology and resources to govern this country so that AMERICA is GREAT for us all.  The time is now and it is OUR TIME.

I am Allen J Cannon,

I am Anti-Corruption

If you still don’t believe here is the transcript from LaVergne Vs Bryson.: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o_SyoXQWvb1bO02XPD0aGWU_gaN5Rro5/view?usp=sharing

MAGA redefined,,,

This is an except from the Email I received from ColorofChange.org.  It reads as follows, and I quote:

"Dear Allen. 

Our election process is threatened by our election records not being backed up with paper ballots. Our digital ballots could potentially be hacked leaving our system vulnerable.History has shown us election outcomes coming under question leads to Black voter freedom being attacked and restricted. When Trump distracted from questions about his election he did so by accusing Black communities of voter fraud and launching a commission designed to substantiate his lie and restrict Black people's freedom to vote¹.

Our freedom to vote is constantly under attack while elections are not secured. Tell the Senate to pass the "Secure Elections Act" today.

The "Secure Elections Act" has been introduced by a bipartisan group of Senators led by Democratic Senator Kamala Harris." ...end quote

*******Now lets get to it shall we.......

Let me begin by addressing the identity politics of the email. How did they know I am black? Did they know or assume that I am not a multicultural person who identifies with more than one race?  I am so beyond race, political party, gender, or sexual orientation than many could ever fathom.  I have but one criteria for office. ARE YOU HONEST? That is the question I focus my independent research upon.

There is not one single member of Congress that is honest. Well, how could you say that Mr. Cannon, you may ask? Fact: The very first case to enter court on CONGRESS voting to give the FCC the power to change the internet rules known as Net Neutrality was LaVergne Vs US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.  The case was not founded on the FCC vote which got so much press…. The night before the vote. This case was in court in April of last year. It challenges the constitutionality of the House of Representatives (HOR) to transfer that authority to the FCC.

To understand what this means one may need to actually read the case. In short, the argument is based on Article The First.  Article the first is the very first proposed amendment to the US Constitution. Some history behind this proposed amendment can be found here:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14223-article-the-first-is-congress-ignoring-an-amendment-ratified-by-the-states

Article The First was actually designed to ensure that the House of Representatives always provided the people with access to the law-making process. It is why we have a census. The Census determines the size of the HOR. This amendment was thought to have not been ratified. We have proved that it has in fact been ratified.  At this very moment all 50 Attorney Generals of EVERY State in the United States is opposing this REVELATION. I call it revelation because it is law already. It has been law for over 100 years. This revelation is also being opposed by every member of the HOR, the Senate and the President.  It is five regular guys against all of them. Do you understand what that means?  Five citizens vs the finest legal minds in the nation from the best schools, wealthiest families, and generations of being in office.

It is us five guys, against all of the people who are supposed to represent ALL OF US! We are up against people who swore an oath to represent us. They are running for office right now. All of the HOR is up for re-election. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.  They are asking for your vote while keeping you in the dark about this case. Every State legislator is expecting you  to vote for them not knowing this FACT.

So, what does this case mean? It means, the HOR legally does not have a quorum to pass ANY LAW. Votes to carry must have 50% plus ONE. The HOR is supposed to have over 6000 members. Had they followed the CONSTITUTION we would not have this GIGANTIC DISPARITY. This means that gerrymandering and lobbyists lose their hold on our government. The hold is broken by the constitutional stipulation limiting each HOR member to 50 thousand constituents.

So how do I know every state legislator knows? That is because we had to serve them all.  The daunting task of service is what makes a challenge of this magnitude almost imposible. WE, however completed it. We have also staved off each of their motions to get the case thrown out. They are trying to delay this.  They literally used the 3 day government shutdown for a month extension. We just regular folks took two weeks to respond to them and have requested summary judgment in the case.  The research is sound and has been authenticated by the most renown law schools, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Oxford.

The work was published before we went to trial. Here is the link to the source documents: https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306  

Please keep in mind we are just five regular guys using whatever we have at our disposal against all of their might and influence. They know we are using social media tagging this case to ads, and spreading it in DMs, private messages, emails, all social media platforms.  This is truly important for all voters and their families to know.  I am not sure how you feel but I am not voting for anyone who knows this exists and wouldn’t tell me.  This is not something we made up. This is not some new law we are fighting to create. THIS IS LAW NOW!

How many times have regular folk heard a judge say ignorance of the law is no excuse? How many issues have we the people begged Congress to fix? How many public schools have closed? How many conflicts of interests have we witnessed by bankers being placed in government? How many times have we seen banks defraud customers and nothing happened? How many voters spent their whole lives in a party and were purged from their party rolls illegally? How many times have you gone to an elected official and won against big money interests?

I can only implore you everyday up to election day, to remove them all. The biggest reason to vote out all incumbents is because they are actively betraying you right NOW! 

Today we live in a world where the few decide you have no rights and pipelines for oil and prisons are more important than clean lead-free drinking water, sacred land, good food, and medical care.  The few have decided that they are the only ones OUR money should make comfortable. It is our money. It is our government. They have not represented our interests in so long we think its normal? Is that acceptable?

It is not acceptable that every day millions of courtrooms are handing out sentences based on law when the LAW which guarantees we have a say in what laws are made and or changed is NOT BEING FOLLOWED. I am not sure how many ways I can put this. As cynical as I am, I have hope for us all. I have faith in us all.  

I know, as they also know the more people know about this it ends their reign. We can’t depend on people to not vote down the line.  We must elect based on the content character. They select their elite based on compliance to the system they have illegally and unethically kept in place. They have co-opted the message of change and made it appear hopeless. We may never have the opportunity to do anything greater than this. Share this news.  The media won’t cover it.  I have challenged members of Congress to discuss this. NONE will.  No tv station will.  We are all we got…. Sometimes to get something done you have to do it yourself. We are doing our best. Thank you for your attention.

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption