Breaking the news with real breaking news ! ! !

 Every facet of life is tied to politics. This is not a statement that anyone can deny. What we are allowed to say, where we live, how we shop, the information we share, the information we are given, and what it emphasized is a matter of politics. Legislation outlaws baggy pants, no shoes no shirt service, bans on athletic attire, and business dress codes are founded and backed by legislation. The sale of items, the permission to own and operate shops, and where a business can be located are legislated. Zones, variances convents, and permits control what may be done in and on one’s property. Access to schools are controlled by districts who operate based on law.

 People need to start the discussion in churches, fraternities, and in every social network platform the change that is about to occur.  This is vitally important to the fabric of life in America. Soon the shift of who has that say will occur. The concentrated populated areas will control representation in the House of Representatives.  Gerrymandering will be broken as will the control lobbyist have over the House.

How is this possible? The case of LaVergne Vs US House of Representatives is moving toward oral argument. This monumental case establishes undeniable proof that the urban legend of Article the First is real. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment  This once thought to have been an unratified amendment to the Constitution, has been proven to be authentic and valid.

The very first protection offered to the masses by the founding fathers was to ensure that the people remain accurately represented in the law-making process. The link explains what the “proposed” amendment was to be. There are many details that went into proving this has actually been law for over 100 years. I will spare readers the details but will state that the finest law scholars have examined the findings and agree.

What does this all mean? It means that as the population grew the US House of Representatives should have grown. Currently there are 435, noting that it was actually lowered from 437.  These seats are often controlled by county level politicians in gerrymandered districts. This finding and court case should be on every major news network in the country. It is not.  This means that highly populated areas will get their own representation. Major urban centers having excess of 50,000 people will get at least 2 Representatives. Based on 2010 census data the count of members should be over 6,000. That number will rise after the 2020 census is complete.  Census taking is a direct step in determining the number of seats in the House.

Due to the recent issues of election rigging, gerrymandering, altered ballots, and the inaction of Congress to ensure valid elections occur the information of this game changing storm coming should be on everyone’s lips. A few links are provided to substantiate the current flaws in the system as we know it.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41850798

https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2017/08/30/federal-court-determines-wasserman-rigged-election-for-hillary-and-says-%E2%80%9Cso-what%E2%80%9D/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/20271/court-admits-dnc-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-joseph-curl

Despite the common held belief that few even knew the DNC were getting sued many still do not know the case won appeal and is in court right now:  https://ivn.us/2018/01/11/court-order-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-continue/   As of the writing of the article. Updates can be found here: https://twitter.com/dncfraudlawsuit?lang=en  Not the link is a twitter account which means information can go out immediately if need arises.

So, what can you do? For immediate action you can begin sharing this information with all you know. All friends and family should know it. There are deeper writings and video posted to fully understand the case of LaVergne Vs US House of Representatives on this blog: https://wethepeoplercominginnovember.blogspot.com/

There is a plan to remove those responsible for ignoring the rigging of the Presidential election and to deal with those who participated in that rigging. Please understand that we only have a valid reason to oppose a winner if the winner is determined fairly. When the fair competition is compromised we have a responsibility to address that failing in the system because no legitimate winner has emerged.

 There is no such thing as a half-rigged election. There is no election as long as a winner is predetermined. That is a selection.  There are people who are tasked with the responsibility of representing the millions of people who can not come to meetings for what ever reason. Usually the reasons are distance and the number of constituents involved. It is necessary to have Representatives to get anything done.  What is not necessary or even ethical, is for those representatives to ignore the constituents and stake holders.

Consider this fact.  Many of the office holders are from legal career backgrounds.  It is a crime, as a lawyer, to fail to represent a client to the best of one’s ability. So, there is no excuse for anyone having that background to fail to understand the concept of representation. Fact: Elected office comes with a fiduciary responsibility.

According to CityEthics org, “One reason that government ethics is described in terms of obligations is that government officials have a fiduciary duty or obligation toward the community for which they work (and which, in some cases, elected them). Government officials have a special obligation toward the community, usually referred to as “the public,” that is unlike any other obligation. Government ethics deals with conflicts between this special obligation and an official’s other obligations.”

The public has been indoctrinated into accepting corruption and the selective enforcement of the law.  It should not be an acceptable expectation that politicians are corrupt.  The insinuation that to even be in politics one must become corrupt or accept corruption is ridiculous.  

It is time to end this cycle. It starts with us. As we take the house we do so in the interest of the public good. Those who represent our communities will be from those communities and no longer have to have millions at their disposal to run for office. With the limitation of 50,000 constituents each Representative will have to face the people they have been ignoring.

 What is next? We the People of the United States must own our destiny. We must not only push for, but be uncompromising when confronting those who have held the truth from us for so long. We must hold them accountable by vowing to never vote for them again. Yes, it is that simple. The House is our house. It was meant for us. It was not meant to be handed down as a family heirloom or bartered away for personal favors or access to the Congressional floor to bribe our representation.

The source documents of this case can be found by using the following link: https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306

Please know that all we have done this because we have no other choice.  This is not about left, right, red, or blue. This is about right and wrong. The corruption has reached a degree of intolerable proportions and is risking the fatal collapse of our nation. Policy is the action one takes and the decided course of action deemed acceptable to those in the position to enforce it. Our policy is to stand against corruption no matter the source.  Corruption is no longer acceptable nor can we afford to tolerate it any longer. In light of this evidence we can say platforms are ineffective and meaningless as our list of unresolved issue grow and life becomes more difficult for hard working Americans who are reduced to just struggling to survive and abide by the law.

I am Allen J Cannon, and I am Anti-Corruption.

INTERVIEW: Allen J. Cannon on U.S. Constitution and Landmark Lawsuit Inv...

Here is the interview before we made it to the US Supreme Court Docket Number 18-290.

Here is the link to the docket search on the US Supreme Court site:

 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-290.html

Update the case:  The Supreme Court sent the case back to the Appellant Division of the lower court claiming not to have Jurisdiction.  This case is still ongoing.--AJC

What really happened when Bernie Sanders went south.... a response !

This is a response to the article Bernie Sanders in the Deep South by Brianna Joy Gray The link is below.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/what-really-happened-when-bernie-sanders-went-to-mississippi.html

It would be difficult to cover all the things one could say about the Black vote in a single article but, this attempt is not meant to accomplish that mission. When we look at the loss of over 1000 seats by the Democrats, one thing is a fact. The seats have been lost.  The loss of Hillary actually made that fact public knowledge. There is more to the story.

The Black community is a complex living breathing entity. It has varying levels of understanding, education, and economics. A consistent theme could be the physical decline often noted while a parallel effort to improve exists.  It is an economy and environment of struggle. People who live inside are not all trying to get out. They are not all trying to sell drugs for a living, walk around strapped, or dropping out of school to hang on corners.

While those things happen in Black communities the foundations of education, living wage employment, and personal effort exist but are under constant attack.  Local politics have filled elected offices with ineffective politicians while simultaneously growing community leaders trying to make a difference.  These things brings us to logical questions. Why have things not gotten better?  Why are these communities in constant states of decline, debt, and often blatant corruption? The answer is politics.

A deeper examination of the Black community often reveals career politicians who have long careers and are often democrats.  The offices are usually filled with establishment candidates and no local advocates usually break through primaries.  It’s as if the people on the ground, the advocates, never make it past primaries and often rack up losses trying. These losses become seemingly legitimized as futile, as the issues raised in campaigns just keep getting worse. Fact is proven by watching and urban film made in the 1980’s.  The issues are still the same and in many instances have worsened.

In the article Bernie is reported to address the fact that the Democratic party has not met the needs of the black community, as a business model. Here is an excerpt from the article:

“The business model, if you like, of the Democratic Party for the last 15 years or so has been a failure,” said Sanders. “People sometimes don’t see that because there was a charismatic individual named Barack Obama. He was obviously an extraordinary candidate, brilliant guy. But behind that reality, over the last ten years, Democrats have lost about 1,000 seats in state legislatures all across this country.”

Is that shade? One would have to step into the sun to really feel the heat of the truth.  Here it comes.  Many black people hold President Obama as a hero and a role model.  I was as proud as any black person who witnessed something I never thought I would see in my lifetime. That is a Black President.  It was a major accomplishment and our families could often be seen crying in disbelief and joy during his swearing in.  In other parts of the nation there was just swearing.

The election of President Barack Obama is what made Donald trump possible. I will give you time to grasp your pearls and breathe. Now follow plain logic if you will.  I and many did not know Hillary was as bad as she was until I hung on every word of then Senator Obama. I did not stop there. I began to dig on my own, certain that if this man was telling the truth he would not be alive long enough to have it known worldwide.

So, I dug. I did research. I found that he was actually being polite or maybe his articulation came off that way, but the facts were enlightening and horrifying. I could not get my mind around how honest he was about how bad she was for this nation.  The level of corruption he spoke of and was also referenced by Mrs. Obama was mind blowing. The link below reveals some things that now make far more sense than they did when we first heard them. Frame all words thinking articulation does not equal truth.  We hear the eloquent words. Some are impressed by how words flow never realizing which direction the current leads.

See the exchanges here: 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/01/28/the-10-nastiest-moments-of-the-obama-hillary-primary-video/?utm_term=.62f210b3c2a2

If we are to frame all the things said about both candidates by the candidates themselves in the Clinton-Obama race in a narrow perspective of them both being honest about each other a different picture emerges. If we just do our own research to verify what was said it changes what we believe. If we combine those words with what actually happened, not by what we believe, we see how President Trump won. As a caveat, I am not a President Trump fan.  There is something far more dangerous about a person who does not fully realize what one has until it is destroyed, lost or abused. We pray for him because the nation is now by sworn oath his responsibility.

One of my assessments of President Obama is based in the fact that I believed what he said about Mrs. Clinton as did many. Given that fact no one would vote for her. I would have never hired her for anything. I did not understand why he would. If he was certainly good enough to convince me how bad she was I am certain he knew more than he told us.

I admit I was naive.  It was not until Hillary ran again that all she did while empowered by the office President Obama gave her that we learned how bad she really was.  As a military Veteran I believe that the top is responsible. The top holds the power of accountability and responsibility.  Therein lies the rub, or bern.

Many can speak of accountability but rarely have the power to make and hold those violating law accountable for their actions. That is not an opinion. That is a fact. Another fact is that if one has the power and does not use it they are guilty of the infraction, violation, betrayal, or crime by being complicit.

Previously, I mentioned the Black community as a complex living entity. It thrives by what it is fed. Both negative and positive grows to maturity based on its diet.  It does not have fully viable food, information, or power. Things in each category just mentioned are the best and worse humans have ever known.  

As Bernie knows the DNC admitted to felony election fraud in court I can question his desire to act on his power of accountability and his authenticity.  As a member of the Senate he has spoken about Russian hacking the election. The issue’s problem is evidence and a DNC confession to crime exists in official court documents of felony election fraud. Bernie has the power as a Senator as do ALL Senators and Representatives to call for an investigation into the confession and hold those people responsible for crimes. Why this is important is covered in another blog here: 

http://wethepeoplercominginnovember.blogspot.com/2017/08/all-tax-payers-must-focus-on-what-is.html

The logic chain should make the following connections: 

1. President Obama was right about Hillary in 08, 
2. President Obama hired Hillary
3. Hillary established unsecured server, uses position as SoS to collect billions while breaking national security protocols which she knew existed as Flotus, and Senator.
4. Hillary buys DNC and pays for Steele dossier 
5. Hillary destroys evidence in Federal indictment case
6. DNC exposed for felony election fraud, DNC chair resigns and is hired by Hillary
7. Bernie gets cheated, millions of Bernie supporters get purged from Dem rolls and delegates witness collusion to rig the nomination first hand
8. Bill and lynch meet on a plane Hillary is let go by Comey
9. Investigation on Hillary reopened
10. President Obama and all Dems campaign for Hillary including Bernie.
11. Hillary, President Obama and DNC expects all cheated voters to support her based on being Black and loyal to Obama, hate and fear of Trump.
12. Trump wins

There is a book written by Hillary blaming everyone for her loss.  Those 1000 seats lost did not happen overnight. It took an epiphany by voters to see the promises made have not been kept.  Those promises were not kept by politicians and parties. Seeing the truth of the elected responsibility to have at least made an effort to keep those promises prompted voters to withdraw support.

As a voter I would have never known Hillary as the person I see her as today, had it not been for President Obama.  Even as Commander in Chief I hold him responsible for Benghazi. As I said, authority and accountability start at the top. He eventually fired Hillary or she left. We may never know which is fact.  The facts we do know are that had he never hired her she would not have had access to secure emails, decision authority in Benghazi, or a position in the State Department to monetize for personal gain. We can't say for sure if Russia would still own 20% of US Uranium, or if she would have the money to buy the DNC. I doubt it.

So were the voters to actually see the logic behind this presentation I would offer this sentiment. We the people will not give up or give in. Truth and facts are the most precious commodity available.  We cannot fix things we do not know are wrong or are afraid to face. Disappointment happens.  When we learn the truth, we are often disappointed. It is nothing wrong with changing to get better.  We have witnessed our hope and the very change we seek used against us. We have learned and are trying to teach all to verify facts and seek truth.

We can no longer trust those who have a platform to raise awareness but fail to carry the full truth with them. Charisma is something Bernie knows something about. How to deal with the DNC and election fraud are lessons he still has yet to learn.  As for what happens in the Black community, I have this to say.

We take the bitter with the sweet. We have homes and the streets. Blame and game is all around. We empowered silence, and sound. To go up you must be down or figure out a way around that which will grind you to dust. We trust, sometimes more than we should and sometimes not enough. We aspire to become while some settle for what is. Every day we define the word "ENOUGH".  We either don't have enough, which we make enough, have enough, or have taken enough that we can't take anymore.  Enough is the concept the wealthy can never understand because it all can never belong to just one man. The world is often surprised at what we become without admitting it’s because we have made it past everything designed to turn us to dust.  

The Black community is alive.  That is a fact. Just ask the makers of Black Panther. 

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption

Can you name the most important piece of information in Government RIGHT NOW!

Many still do not believe the case of LaVergne Vs Us House Of Representatives is real. Despite the fact that this case has been in court since April of 20017. ( https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2017cv00793/186187 ). It is not our fault that more people do not know what this case means or of its existence.  Something this important has existed for almost a year and a march that took place for one day is covered all over the world. One would be wise to wonder how that could be possible.

I submit for your consideration that the deepest connected legal minds in the country hired by the most powerful people in the country have not managed to get this case thrown out on a technicality. 

To make this abundantly clear. This case has, on one, side FIVE regular guys. On the other opposing side, is every state Attorney General for all 50 states of the United States of America, and attorneys who represent ALL the members of the House, the US Senate, The President, The Vice President and the Secretary of the US Chamber of Commerce.  The litigants makes this newsworthy all by itself.  Five guys against all of their legal prowess, meanwhile the public is distracted by stories of pets, beauty tips, vacations, and the lifestyles of the rich and famous.

What makes this story NOT newsworthy? Certainly, if it was “Frivolous” they would have found a way to end this quickly. People have said it would never happen.  They may have meant we would never get this far. People said we were crazy.  They never read the evidence.  Where are we as a society when we just accept that corruption will do as it pleases?  Those who have no hope, rely on those of us who do.  We who have hope that justice exists, and the law actually means something have never stopped hoping.

Please allow me to impart a bit of enlightenment.  There is a case named Lavergne V Bryson. It took place in NJ. The judge in the case dismissed the case. The case is the type of case where a three judge panel would have to convene to dismiss the case on merit. A single judge could determine the presiding court did not have jurisdiction, and refer the case to an appropriate court.  In the case mentioned a single judge dismissed the case based on merit. When it happened of course those who brought the case were upset. It was a clear miscarriage of the law. In fact, it was wrong. 

During the Lavergne V House case the attorneys of several States and the Federal attorney argued that one of the plaintiffs should be removed. This is a measure called collateral estoppel.  Not only did it not apply in this case, but it opened the case of LaVergne V Bryson back up revealing the issue of improper dismissal.  Keep in mind all the plaintiffs in this case are Pro se. The best the highest paid trained minds could come up with was to try to throw one of the plaintiffs off?

The sheer fact that we are all Pro se (that means we are NOT attorneys and do not have lawyers representing us), is NEWS… yes BIG NEWS. So, why is this not being reported when celebrity relationships and corruption are in the headlines EVERY day?  It is not that media does not know. You can look at my TL on twitter  @AJC4Others and see how many times I have contacted them all about this case. I often place this case on something THEY tweeted!

For those who say 6000 members in the House is too many, I offer this. One elected person authorized by the Constitution speaking on the behalf of millions but selling that voice to the highest bidder is NOT working.  It does not work in the Oval Office, head of the FBI, head of the Unions, or in the case of any department head.  The constituency is supposed to remove those who sell their influence. That is how it is designed to work. The limit placed on the size of their constituency is painstakingly designed to limit the power of one person. No one state can run the country, especially not now. 

In the light of felony election fraud there is not a single member of Congress who is not guilty of the most egregious offence possible in public office. They violated the public trust and undermined the very process which makes ELECTING a President LEGAL and binding.  ALL incumbents are guilty of that. Any State could have challenged the election results through their representation in the Senate. You want to support a Senator? Ask them. Ask them why no member of the Senate or the House of Representatives called for an official investigation to rigging the election. The Rigging by the DNC, which the DNC admitted it in court and claimed it was their right to do so as a private organization.

Why are we bombarded with the narrative that Russia influenced the election by Facebook ads when Facebook filtered most anti-Hillary content and censored accounts which did not support her?  Why is Facebook is not being investigated? Why is Google is not being investigated in its role in manipulating search results? This is what 6000 new members in the House of Representatives will fix. These new members can, and will call for and conduct investigations WITH OUTCOMES that will lock up criminals, those taking bribes, and lock up their cronies. Do you remember that 3 day Government shutdown? Their lawyers got a 30-day extension from it. They are running out of time and excuses.

For those who don't get it, think it will make things worse, or have made their living from selling influence it does not matter what you think. What matters is this is ALREADY LAW.  It is already law. We all know ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ask any judge.

This 6000 plus membership will be comprised of US. For the first time in modern history we will have real representation.  Elected office will no longer be a family heirloom to be passed to offspring and college pals. It is time to return ethics, honor, service, and our voices back to where they belong.  We must spread the word of this because they will distract the public and spin this so many ways you won’t know what to do… or believe.

There is no need for all these Representatives to even live in Washington. Many companies and the Federal government have employees who work from home. Secure connections exist and work. It is why breaking a secure net, taking data from a secure net, and altering a secure net is a CRIME.  We have the technology and resources to govern this country so that AMERICA is GREAT for us all.  The time is now and it is OUR TIME.

I am Allen J Cannon,

I am Anti-Corruption

If you still don’t believe here is the transcript from LaVergne Vs Bryson.: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o_SyoXQWvb1bO02XPD0aGWU_gaN5Rro5/view?usp=sharing

MAGA redefined,,,

This is an except from the Email I received from ColorofChange.org.  It reads as follows, and I quote:

"Dear Allen. 

Our election process is threatened by our election records not being backed up with paper ballots. Our digital ballots could potentially be hacked leaving our system vulnerable.History has shown us election outcomes coming under question leads to Black voter freedom being attacked and restricted. When Trump distracted from questions about his election he did so by accusing Black communities of voter fraud and launching a commission designed to substantiate his lie and restrict Black people's freedom to vote¹.

Our freedom to vote is constantly under attack while elections are not secured. Tell the Senate to pass the "Secure Elections Act" today.

The "Secure Elections Act" has been introduced by a bipartisan group of Senators led by Democratic Senator Kamala Harris." ...end quote

*******Now lets get to it shall we.......

Let me begin by addressing the identity politics of the email. How did they know I am black? Did they know or assume that I am not a multicultural person who identifies with more than one race?  I am so beyond race, political party, gender, or sexual orientation than many could ever fathom.  I have but one criteria for office. ARE YOU HONEST? That is the question I focus my independent research upon.

There is not one single member of Congress that is honest. Well, how could you say that Mr. Cannon, you may ask? Fact: The very first case to enter court on CONGRESS voting to give the FCC the power to change the internet rules known as Net Neutrality was LaVergne Vs US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.  The case was not founded on the FCC vote which got so much press…. The night before the vote. This case was in court in April of last year. It challenges the constitutionality of the House of Representatives (HOR) to transfer that authority to the FCC.

To understand what this means one may need to actually read the case. In short, the argument is based on Article The First.  Article the first is the very first proposed amendment to the US Constitution. Some history behind this proposed amendment can be found here:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14223-article-the-first-is-congress-ignoring-an-amendment-ratified-by-the-states

Article The First was actually designed to ensure that the House of Representatives always provided the people with access to the law-making process. It is why we have a census. The Census determines the size of the HOR. This amendment was thought to have not been ratified. We have proved that it has in fact been ratified.  At this very moment all 50 Attorney Generals of EVERY State in the United States is opposing this REVELATION. I call it revelation because it is law already. It has been law for over 100 years. This revelation is also being opposed by every member of the HOR, the Senate and the President.  It is five regular guys against all of them. Do you understand what that means?  Five citizens vs the finest legal minds in the nation from the best schools, wealthiest families, and generations of being in office.

It is us five guys, against all of the people who are supposed to represent ALL OF US! We are up against people who swore an oath to represent us. They are running for office right now. All of the HOR is up for re-election. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.  They are asking for your vote while keeping you in the dark about this case. Every State legislator is expecting you  to vote for them not knowing this FACT.

So, what does this case mean? It means, the HOR legally does not have a quorum to pass ANY LAW. Votes to carry must have 50% plus ONE. The HOR is supposed to have over 6000 members. Had they followed the CONSTITUTION we would not have this GIGANTIC DISPARITY. This means that gerrymandering and lobbyists lose their hold on our government. The hold is broken by the constitutional stipulation limiting each HOR member to 50 thousand constituents.

So how do I know every state legislator knows? That is because we had to serve them all.  The daunting task of service is what makes a challenge of this magnitude almost imposible. WE, however completed it. We have also staved off each of their motions to get the case thrown out. They are trying to delay this.  They literally used the 3 day government shutdown for a month extension. We just regular folks took two weeks to respond to them and have requested summary judgment in the case.  The research is sound and has been authenticated by the most renown law schools, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Oxford.

The work was published before we went to trial. Here is the link to the source documents: https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306  

Please keep in mind we are just five regular guys using whatever we have at our disposal against all of their might and influence. They know we are using social media tagging this case to ads, and spreading it in DMs, private messages, emails, all social media platforms.  This is truly important for all voters and their families to know.  I am not sure how you feel but I am not voting for anyone who knows this exists and wouldn’t tell me.  This is not something we made up. This is not some new law we are fighting to create. THIS IS LAW NOW!

How many times have regular folk heard a judge say ignorance of the law is no excuse? How many issues have we the people begged Congress to fix? How many public schools have closed? How many conflicts of interests have we witnessed by bankers being placed in government? How many times have we seen banks defraud customers and nothing happened? How many voters spent their whole lives in a party and were purged from their party rolls illegally? How many times have you gone to an elected official and won against big money interests?

I can only implore you everyday up to election day, to remove them all. The biggest reason to vote out all incumbents is because they are actively betraying you right NOW! 

Today we live in a world where the few decide you have no rights and pipelines for oil and prisons are more important than clean lead-free drinking water, sacred land, good food, and medical care.  The few have decided that they are the only ones OUR money should make comfortable. It is our money. It is our government. They have not represented our interests in so long we think its normal? Is that acceptable?

It is not acceptable that every day millions of courtrooms are handing out sentences based on law when the LAW which guarantees we have a say in what laws are made and or changed is NOT BEING FOLLOWED. I am not sure how many ways I can put this. As cynical as I am, I have hope for us all. I have faith in us all.  

I know, as they also know the more people know about this it ends their reign. We can’t depend on people to not vote down the line.  We must elect based on the content character. They select their elite based on compliance to the system they have illegally and unethically kept in place. They have co-opted the message of change and made it appear hopeless. We may never have the opportunity to do anything greater than this. Share this news.  The media won’t cover it.  I have challenged members of Congress to discuss this. NONE will.  No tv station will.  We are all we got…. Sometimes to get something done you have to do it yourself. We are doing our best. Thank you for your attention.

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption

ELECTION of the ENTIRE House of Representatives happens in 2018

2018 is the year of We The People.

Do you know that in a few short months, the entire US House of Representatives can be replaced? This is a mid-term election which means this will still be the 115^th Congress. 

One may ask, where do members of Congress come from? Are they hatched, bred, or created in a lab? Strangely enough the answer may be more sinister than you ever thought possible.  Some are groomed, trained, and paid to become members of Congress. If you have a favorite Member of Congress keep that name in your head as you read what happened from the perspective of duty, obligation, law, oath of office and the CONSTITUTION.  

So where do these  people come from? It usually starts at the top or in a local party meeting.  Those with the favor of party bosses get the line and they usually anticipate everyone just voting down the line.  As we learned in the last Presidential primary, they do have a backup plan when their pick runs into some strong competition.  But, all of that is about to change.

For the first time in our nation’s recent history we have issues too numerous for any of US to NOT have a problem with CONGRESS. Congress can’t approve the biggest military budget in the history of mankind and talk of how dangerous guns are. Congress can’t talk of tax cuts when the richest people in the world tripled their wealth without lifting a finger.  Congress can’t talk of transparency with all the lies and lies about lies and investigations and conflicts of interest it currently has. Congress can’t speak of fair elections, meddling, hacking, bribery, and media interference when they let a tainted election which violated their duty and oath of office by not protecting the constituents or the Constitution. Not one asked that the felony election fraud admitted to by the DNC (in FEDERAL COURT) be investigated. Still have that favorite in mind?

In every company in America people get fired. People reach mandatory retirement ages.  Some companies even have bylaws that require reorganization meetings. But, All companies have bylaws and incorporation papers. The DNC violated its own charter, bylaws, and ethical standards of conduct. If that was not bad enough… CONGRESS failed in its Fiduciary duty as it said nothing of ALL the taxpayers in America being defrauded by the DNC rigging the primary. Still holding on to that favorite?

Here is what we know as fact. The DNC testified in court that it did in fact rig the primary for Hillary.  The DNC further claim that as a private organization it was within its RIGHTS to select a nominee.  The DNC also claims rigging an election is protected under FREDOM OF SPEECH.

My belief is that NO member of Congress should return. No member of Congress stood up for the US Constitution. Every single Taxpayer and entity was defrauded by the DNC because dollars are not marked in denominations of Democrat or Republican. Therefore, State and Federal money used to pay for RIGGED primaries constitutes FRAUD.

No matter what party you are in, claim, ride, and swear allegiance to know this.  Not ONE member of Congress stood to protect the voting process. NOT ONE! Not one stood to protect the verifiable outcome of the most important election our nation has for what may be the most powerful seat in the world. NOT ONE.  It is impossible to legally impeach the President at this time.  Those who speak of it already know it is legally impossible.  They still fan flames of hate while warming themselves by the fire.  How and why it is legally impossible to bring articles of impeachment against The President will be covered in my next article. Some of you may already know why it is legally impossible but… ALL OF CONGRESS knows why it is a legal impossibility.  Mark your calendars.  2018 is the year We The People get a brand new CONGRESS.

As you start to campaign, recommend, support, donate time and money I ask one simple question. NAME THE ONE MEMBER OF CONGRESS WHO DEFENDED THE  PROPER ELECTION PROCESS, The CONSTITUTION, The CONSTITUENTS, THE PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER and dealt with the rigging of the election as admitted to by the DNC? Still got that favorite in your head?

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption.

The Most important case in US History Happening right NOW !

For Release: December 2nd, 2017


Preface - “No Quorum = No Legislation”


This case proves that the 115th Congress has no quorum in the House of Representatives. As such, NO action taken by the House since January 3rd is yet complete. We, the PEOPLE, are the masters of that HOUSE, and those within it are sent to SERVE - not to RULE.


“Stand for what’s right, or settle for what’s left”- Frederick John LaVergne, Democrat for Congress, New Jersey’s Third Congressional District, 2018.



PRESS RELEASE:


LaVergne v. U.S. House of Representatives:


One of the most important legal cases in American History, so why isn’t everybody talking about it?


Check out the proofs in the Public Docket (PACER® Case No. 1:17-cv-793-CKK-CP-RDM), specifically the pending Summary Judgment Motion, and pay attention in the coming weeks and months to all developments in LaVergne v. U.S. House of Representatives as if your freedom and the future of the United States depends on it. Because it does.


Every year thousands upon thousands of civil lawsuits are filed in the Federal Courts. Since the adoption of the United States Constitution almost 230 years ago there have been millions upon millions of civil cases filed in our Federal Courts. Out of that almost incalculable number, but a scant few have carved out a sustaining place in history and are immediately known to all Judges, Lawyers and Students of Government by their name alone due to the profound and lasting effect each case has had on our history and the way we as a People live: Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. Board of Education, Reynolds v. Simms, New York Times v. Sullivan, Roe v. Wade, Citizen’s United v. Federal Election Commission, to name but a few. And now it appears we can add to that list LaVergne v. U.S. House of Representatives. But if LaVergne v. U.S. House of Representatives is really one of the most important legal case in history, then why isn’t everybody talking about it? Perhaps because few people know or are paying attention. Yet.


In December 2016, in the waning days of President Barak Obama’s Administration, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a new proposed Agency Rule in the Federal Register entitled “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services.” This new Agency Rule operated to protect privacy interest of citizens by, among other things, barring Internet Service Providers from collecting and selling or otherwise disseminating a customer’s personal, business and health information to third parties for free or for profit. Boring - but many would argue important - stuff. 

Under the Congressional Review Act, these proposed new FCC Agency Rules aimed at protecting citizen’s privacy interests would automatically become binding Federal Law unless during a statutory specified time period Congress passed and the President signed a “disapproval resolution”. During the operative time period, on January 3, 2015 the new 435 Members of the One Hundred and Fifteenth Congress were sworn in to office. Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin was ostensibly elected as Speaker of the House. At noon on January 20, 2017 Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. Thereafter, and during the operative statutory time period for Congress to reject the proposed new FCC Agency Rules, the Senate passed a “disapproval resolution”, and on March 28, 2017 the House of Representatives formally voted in favor of the “disapproval resolution.” On April 3, 2017 the “disapproval resolution”, as passed in the Senate and House, was presented to President Trump for his approval, and on that same date President Trump signed the “disapproval resolution”, now identified as Public Law No. 115-22, thereby permanently blocking the proposed new FCC Agency Rules from becoming Federal Law.


Almost immediately a small group of citizens filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Washington D.C. challenging Public Law No. 115-22. Since Public Law No. 115-22 rejected (or “disallowed”) the proposed new FCC Agency Rules, Internet Service Providers were and are now free to sell customer’s private personal, business and health information to third parties. Plaintiffs objected to this as an invasion of their privacy rights which therefore tangibly injured them, and they challenged Public Law No. 115-22 as unconstitutional. What makes this case significant and important is not that the Plaintiffs challenge Public Law No. 115-22 as unconstitutional. Rather, it is the actual basis upon which they claim the law is unconstitutional.


Plaintiffs claim that Article the First, the literal first ever amendment proposed to the United States Constitution by Congress to the States actually was ratified into law some time before 1792 and was lost or hidden in history. The whole story is told in a detailed 600 page book authored by lead Plaintiff Eugene Martin LaVergne entitled How “Less” is “More”: The Real First Amendment to the United States Constitution, published by First Amendment Free Press, Inc., New York, New York (2016). Plaintiffs contend that if they are correct than this lost but fully ratified Constitutional Amendment requires that there be more than 6,200 Representatives in the United States House of Representatives. 

The Constitution requires that a Quorum - 50% +1 of the full membership of the Members of a Legislative Body - be present before any business may be voted on. If Plaintiff’s are correct, then this means that more than 3,100 Representatives must be elected and appear before the House of Representatives may vote on anything. This means that the vote taken in the House on March 28, 2017 on Public Law No. 115-22 was taken in the absence of a Quorum, rendering the law unconstitutional. This also means that Paul Ryan is not legally the Speaker of the House, nor is he in the line of Presidential Succession. Nor may the House vote on Articles of Impeachment until there is a Quorum of more than 3,100 Representatives.


At first glance Plaintiff’s contention that there should be more than 6,200 Representatives in the House all sounds preposterous. The stuff of tin foil hats and rubber rooms. Until you read LaVergne’s book or see the actual proofs on file in the lawsuit. Then it becomes, well, it becomes disturbingly real and more than possible, it becomes down right likely that the Plaintiffs will win. 

No less than United States Court of Appeals Judge Merrick Garland (yes, the guy President Obama nominated for the United States Supreme Court) has Ordered that a special Three Judge Federal District Court be convened to hear the Plaintiffs Claims in Federal Court in Washington. And the Plaintiffs have already filed a Motion for Summary Judgment which remains on the Public Docket for the essential proofs to be reviewed by anyone willing to look. The Court’s consideration of this motion will occur after several procedural issues are argued and decided. Otherwise stated, there is essentially no argument from the Defendants that the Plaintiffs are not 100% historically accurate! 

So, for now the issue is whether the Federal Court will be procedurally allowed to acknowledge historical and legal truth and provide a meaningful remedy. The smart money is that they will. Which will, in one fell swoop, completely restructure one half of the Legislative Branch of our Federal Government, will greatly increase Representation of the People in the United States House of Representatives, and will greatly increase the number of Electoral Votes used to select a President. 

So, wake up, pay attention, and check out the proofs in the Public Docket (PACER® Case No. 1:17-cv-793-CKK-CP-RDM) and pay attention in the coming weeks and months to all developments in LaVergne v. U.S. House of Representatives as if your freedom and the future of the United States depends on it. Because it does.


Press CTRL and left click on your mouse on link below:


https://www.amazon.com/How-Less-More-Amendment-Constitution-ebook/dp/B01N69X1YZ/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1512135999&sr=8-4&keywords=how+less+is+more

Open Letter To VP Pence and All citizens of the United States

This is an open letter to VP Pence, all future and past Presidents of the United States, its citizens, and all elected Representatives of its people and territories.

Standing with Veterans is not just rising from a chair and standing behind a microphone or using media dissemination to make a point. As a 25-year Vet, I stood with Veterans. I stood with them in every military engagement from Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan. My standing with them began in signing up for military service, taking an oath, and doing all humanly possible not to break that oath. In standing with them I supported operations that I was not on the ground to be a part of as well of those I was in an expeditionary role. In standing with my fellow service members, my actions and those “standing with” us supported the safe return and honorable dignified commemoration of those compatriots lost to us in service and their civilian counterparts.

This service includes Grenada, Bosnia, Desert Storm I & II, OEF, OIF, Korea, Europe, responding at the Pentagon and disaster relief. In addition to these well-known instances there are countless others the American people are not privy to. This service also includes working in uniform for the Department of The Army Casualty and Mortuary Affairs, and at VA hospitals as a Soldier, and DOD Civilians. Standing with them became standing with us. We are inseparably one. Of this service, I am humbly proud and deeply honored.

I have served knowing the broken promises Veterans face and the deep dedication which we have to each other in service. As emotionally difficult the duty IS to serve those who have lost family in service to OUR nation it is a different kind of emotionally charged duty in comparison to serving those who are injured. Why is that so? It is because the bond between Service Members leaves the survivor feeling they have let their team down and their absence may prevent another brother or sister in arms from coming home safely. The families caring for the member is a service that changes their lives. 

Please be mindful that not all injuries are visible with the naked eye. Many live with wounds sustained in service to this nation. Some are afraid of the perception those they have protected may have of them if these wounds were to be known.  The fear, failure to seek treatment, and just trying to deal with it on their own, is a testament to what they believe is will, strength, dignified pride, and independence because they don’t want pity.

I have the personal experience of trying to convince these valiant, brave, and honorable people that they must focus on their recovery and life outside the military. I have also had to help families deal with the new responsibility of supporting that effort. It is no easy task because of the selflessness our members have. Selflessness and dedication are traits OUR members have as a foundation.

I always look them and their loved ones in the eye to convey our commitment to supporting them.

Support comes in many ways. Prayers, demonstrations, financial support, appropriations, proper equipment, acknowledgment of service, welcome home celebrations, receptions, and keeping promised benefits in place.  Our members are shown who really cares about them in many ways. They also know who is selfishly politically jeopardizing or exploiting these greatly appreciated support efforts.

The next time you or anyone utters the words “I stand with our troops” consider these things. Paying bonuses to those who deny us medical treatment is not standing with us. Reducing our benefits and breaking the terms of our agreements to serve, is not standing with us. Standing behind a podium making speeches about us without sharing our burden, is not standing with us. Not taking care of those who have lost one of us, is not standing with us. Making any disparaging remarks about any of us or our families, is not standing with us. Not protecting those we have sworn to protect, is not standing us. Attacking those who support us, is not standing with us.

To be clear, distractions while in uniform jeopardize every mission. Lives are always in the balance while in uniform. We accept the risk. Our families support us in this monumental decision.  Service members cannot fully focus on our mission when we are worried about home and those we love. Worry is something we and our families face with courage, hope, and faith.

 We understand we represent our nation and do not take the responsibility lightly. Congress, the branches of government, and the White House must understand that it is painting a picture of the US that makes the dutiful service of those who volunteered harder. These entities are also making it harder for the current and next generation of protectors to justify what it is we are protecting, and from who or what protection is legitimate.

You nor anyone can “stand with us” unless you join us. You can, as can everyone else, rise to support us, encourage, strengthen, and love us. Whether one takes a knee as we do in presenting this nation’s flag to the families of the fallen, standing with hand over heart, or meeting us at the airport upon our return, it is gratitude we have earned and sacrificed to obtain.

The odd thing is that less than 1% of our population ever serves in the military at any given time, while 100% enjoys the freedoms we provide. Freedom of speech is not meant to give one the right to be offensive but to express one’s self so that every citizen may be heard. There is a way of saying things that one wants to convey. Even if those things are untruthful, it is how it is said and by whom that makes statements believable or effective.

When it comes to the NFL, any citizen, or organization expressing their position must remember it is us in uniform standing together with the support of a grateful nation ensuring the rights and freedoms of expression. You may exercise, as a private citizen whatever perspective you desire. We who serve do so that your ability remains intact. As a representative of this nation as we are also, please know we would appreciate a deeper allegiance to those we are bound and obligated to serve. As our actions are no longer our own nor our responsibilities relegated to our own agendas. Please continue to support us in accordance with our nations oath of office. It is the oath by which we all swear. It is an additional oath I have also sworn as an elected official in addition to the those to which I am bound by military service and an employee of a government agency.

In closing, our Service Members cannot afford to play politics or be divided on issues highlighted by the media and those with a platform to raise. We are one team. All branches of service work together as a matter of duty. We are resolute in bringing all of us home never leaving those by our side behind. When we ask for support, as we do and will we would also appreciate you knowing what support means. Every citizen has the opportunity to apply to stand with us. Those who do not qualify for military service are told why.  We do not harbor any animosity toward those who choose not to serve. In so saying we will not be disrespected, demeaned, or exploited by those who chose not to stand with us, or used their influence to avoid service.

As I finish this letter I take a knee in prayer for our Service Members in harms way. I also pray for you and all our Representatives. I pray you all will have the fortitude to ensure elections are fair, our military is not squandered for corporate interest, and that those in positions of influence will work to ensure safe water, air, food, livable wages, and equity for all the citizens of this land and those lands our nation is protecting from violence, exploitation and greed. Just because a person makes a law does not make the law fair, right or just. What makes any law just is that it is consistently applied to all.

Have a great day and a better tomorrow.

v/r

Allen J Cannon

US Citizen and Veteran, US Army

All tax payers must focus on what is important.

Hello all, and may this writing find you safe and prosperous.

This maybe the 2nd most important issue of our time.  The first is yet to be revealed. Stay tuned later this month for more details.

This is about something NOT in the news. Here is another perspective on a case in court right now.  It is the DNC Election Fraud Lawsuit.

Fact: DNC owes every state and the Federal Government money back because they rigged the primary.  FED matching funds and the money EVERY state spent on the rigged primary should be the subject of the total fraud committed.  This argument should be based on the motions filed by the DNC in court.

https://www.facebook.com/DNCfraudlawsuit/posts/787111798118297

This link provides rules for public funding:  https://transition.fec.gov/pages/brochures/pubfund.shtml#anchor688095 . 

The money spent by each state did not come from just democrats. Those Billions came from all tax payers in those states, even independents who do not have a primary. It also came from individuals who have not yet registered to vote. It is a FACT that one has to declare party affiliation, thereby removing their ability to participate in the primary of the other party. One could argue that the decision is driven by charters and statements made by the party. The declaration of party affiliation is a written document thereby a contract. If nothing else, it enforces exclusion from other primary voting. The further exclusion by the DNC was committed by purging its roles of Bernie supporters in districts and reducing polling locations thereby creating bottlenecks to discourage voters and overtaxing resources thereby complicating counting efforts by exasperation and physical demands significantly raising the chance of error by fatigue.

Why aren’t the DNC assets frozen?  If this is true: Rep. Ron DeSantis (R., Fla.), an oversight committee member and chair of its national security subcommittee, petitioned Attorney General Jeff Sessions to disclose if federal investigators are moving to freeze recent wire transfers of nearly $300,000 by Imran Awan, a top IT staffer for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) and scores of other Democrats who was recently arrested on charges of bank fraud. Then why would’t the DNC assets be frozen as well?

The point is, all who are thinking they can change the DNC from the inside are blind to the fact that the decisions made regarding the DNC are above their access level. Without going into all the things wrong and candidates I submit this. If according to gallop poll: http://www.gallup.com/poll/185891/majority-maintain-need-third-major-party.aspx  60% of those polled agree there is a need for a third party. That’s already a majority the two party system cannot win against.

 The issue is, major party status is determined by numbers. I contend, the DNC, by holding onto Bernie supporters will remain viable at least numerically. If you would never support the DNC but love Bernie they will use him up to the last minute for donations and attendance at rallies.

This case is about democracy. It is about whether the DNC gets away with cheating, fraud, violation of the VRA, and forcing you to support who ever they pick. There is no such thing as a half rigged fair race. All Americans must see that the DNC did not just steal money from the Democrat supporters who thought their vote counted and listened to the DNC and main stream media tell the nation it was neutral.

No, they did not just cheat the Democrats, and Independent Voters who changed party affiliation just to participate in the primary. It did not just cheat all those who raised money and spent hours of free time informing the public about Bernie. Just for the record, the DNC did not just cheat Bernie.

There is no single issue more important than this because this is how those who make decisions affecting all of us get seated. It’s how challengers to change the system get cheated. It's how things keep getting worse. No seated member of Congress dares to speak out against DWS or the fact that they could have challenged her being seated… like they did Adam Clayton Powell. http://history.house.gov/HistoricalHighlight/Detail/36843?ret=True

The truth is, they all benefited by the fraud committed by the DNC. The establishment candidates won their primaries with the same rigging that occurred to defeat Bernie. Additionally, I submit at the DNC convention an entirely new type of fraud took place. Ask any Bernie delegate. As elected officials, they witnessed firsthand what happened. Obstruction of their electoral rights were thwarted. Main stream Media, those on stage, and those reporting or failing to report the actual events are complicit.

This video is after the DNC’s second motion to dismiss. It is worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz_dRxwEmDM

At the end of the day…. WE are all Americans endowed with inalienable rights. It is not about what party we choose to belong. The point is, we should have the choice to VOTE for what every candidate we choose for what every reason. Just as our tax dollars are not separated by us when we pay them, the dollars we pay are used for primaries. Even those who are independent voters pay and do not get a primary but have had their tax dollars used for rigged primaries.

The DNC's major party existence depends on numbers. We have no way of knowing if they will ever accurately report the number of votes, registered voters, or any information which revokes their major party status. We also have no way of knowing if any other party emerges because there is no third-party primary.  

I am of the opinion that this is the only story voters should be watching daily and those who have an interest in covering it up are complicit. I know I usually dont place links in my posts but in this case it is really important to provide material to substantiate my concerns.

I am Allen J Cannon. I am anti-Corruption.

Have a blessed and positive day. Stay thirsty for truth my friends. Peace.