As we consider what is real we must know what distractions exist.
A distraction is everything that prevents one from seeing what is really
important. Many may call it focus. Some
call it awareness. No matter what you call it, paying attention to the wrong
thing at the wrong time can cause you loss.
We don’t want people to text and drive, but they do. Many
are busy making live postings while driving. The lure to make one’s self
important is a distraction. The call to make someone else important can also be
a distraction. Pouring our effort into those who would take instead of give at
every instance is what many have chosen to do. Is it the fault of the taker or
those who give?
When will we see ourselves worthy of each other? When will
we see those who are worthy of our support.
Corruption is not a matter of party. It is not a matter of race, creed
,or sexual orientation. It is a matter of greed. Greed has no limits so the
greedy have no limits. Greed will and has turned people into those we do not
recognize and into those we know all too well.
When we will refuse to offer our time to those who would not
defend us although they are sworn by law and oath of office to do so? There is no need to re-invent the wheel when
it comes to any issue such as healthcare, tax reform, or education. There are
models that exist that are working for those who have them. Those models exist because
they are in the hands of the corrupted. Those who have the best for themselves
claim to need to invent something different for the rest of us.
Too many examples of universal healthcare exist. These examples exist in countries who have
less than we do in the US. We should not have to have something that does not
cover everyone tweaked for us. We should have the same coverage as Members of Congress
has. Their separation from the people should be duly noted as a matter of
principle, not party, or reputation. Access to medical care should not be on
merely an emergency basis.
How many remember when hospitals were segregated although
the Hippocratic Oath existed? How many died just because physicians and the
medical community felt the color of ones skin made them worth less or more to
society as a whole. It is not until we
ALL see that we are made better by the gifts we share instead of the gifts
politicians get to keep the status quo.
There is no law Congress can pass that has merit as long as Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in office. They are all complicit in Federal
Election Fraud as long as she is in their number and voting. The general public
must understand that the vote is vital
to our survival. The vote gave us Citizens United, Obamacare, segregation,
civil rights and the actual ability to vote.
Why should one such as she have any standing when the vote itself is
under question? Every vote while she
remains in office is invalid. It is hypocritical, and undermines the validity
of the process.
It is never the outcome of the votes counted that supersedes the
process of counting them. The process is
sacred. The process is the foundation of democracy. The process is how we voice
our support or rejection of policy and those who embody the policy with which
we disapprove.
The right to disapprove, agree, support, or challenge means
nothing to those who are already ignoring the voices of the public. It is at a
point where the public does not matter to them. What is painfully obvious is
how much the deals they make to stay in office matter.
TThose supporting the corruption of the vote are in
office right now. Every day that passes they hope we will forget or be
distracted by the fact that none of them are legitimate. They are not
legitimate because they have violated the oath of office as it reads as provide
by the United States publishing office: Ҥ3331. Oath of office
An individual, except
the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the
civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true
faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without
any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So
help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.)
Historical and Revision Notes
|
||
Derivation
|
U.S.
Code
|
Revised
Statutes and
Statutes at Large
|
5 U.S.C. 16.
|
R.S. §1757.
May 13, 1884, ch. 46,
§§2, 3, 23 Stat. 22.
|
All but the quoted
language in R.S. §1757 is omitted as obsolete since R.S. §1757 was originally
an alternative oath to the oath prescribed in R.S. §1756 which oath was
repealed by the Act of May 13, 1884, ch. 46, §2, 23 Stat. 22. The words “An
individual, except the President, . . . in the civil service or uniformed
services” are substituted for “any person . . . either in the civil, military,
or naval service, except the President of the United States”. The second
sentence of former section 16 is changed to read, “This section does not affect
other oaths required by law.”.
Standard changes are
made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as
outlined in the preface to the report:
It is the Constitution
that requires defending. Not our gender, race, political party, or any demographic
we decide to divide ourselves into, or be so divided by others. While the
masses are engulfed in the distraction of illegality and blaming each other for
what we have, they should be looking at what we don’t have. We don’t have a
Congress that is defending the most basic right of the vote. We don’t have a
Congress who takes that right serious enough to stand against the violators of
that right. We don’t have a Congress that has a legitimate legal right to make
any law as it has broken the most basic from which all responsibility and power
of office depends. It has broken the oath of office. No one can assume office
without being given the oath. No one can legally stay in office while breaking
it. As long as DWS remains in Congress every law they make is subject to the
challenge of law.
I am Anti-Corruption.
No comments:
Post a Comment