Friday, March 30, 2018

Can you name the most important piece of information in Government RIGHT NOW!


Many still do not believe the case of LaVergne Vs Us House Of Representatives is real. Despite the fact that this case has been in court since April of 20017. ( https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2017cv00793/186187 ). It is not our fault that more people do not know what this case means or of its existence.  Something this important has existed for almost a year and a march that took place for one day is covered all over the world. One would be wise to wonder how that could be possible.

I submit for your consideration that the deepest connected legal minds in the country hired by the most powerful people in the country have not managed to get this case thrown out on a technicality. 

To make this abundantly clear. This case has, on one, side FIVE regular guys. On the other opposing side, is every state Attorney General for all 50 states of the United States of America, and attorneys who represent ALL the members of the House, the US Senate, The President, The Vice President and the Secretary of the US Chamber of Commerce.  The litigants makes this newsworthy all by itself.  Five guys against all of their legal prowess, meanwhile the public is distracted by stories of pets, beauty tips, vacations, and the lifestyles of the rich and famous.

What makes this story NOT newsworthy? Certainly, if it was “Frivolous” they would have found a way to end this quickly. People have said it would never happen.  They may have meant we would never get this far. People said we were crazy.  They never read the evidence.  Where are we as a society when we just accept that corruption will do as it pleases?  Those who have no hope, rely on those of us who do.  We who have hope that justice exists, and the law actually means something have never stopped hoping.

Please allow me to impart a bit of enlightenment.  There is a case named Lavergne V Bryson. It took place in NJ. The judge in the case dismissed the case. The case is the type of case where a three judge panel would have to convene to dismiss the case on merit. A single judge could determine the presiding court did not have jurisdiction, and refer the case to an appropriate court.  In the case mentioned a single judge dismissed the case based on merit. When it happened of course those who brought the case were upset. It was a clear miscarriage of the law. In fact, it was wrong. 

During the Lavergne V House case the attorneys of several States and the Federal attorney argued that one of the plaintiffs should be removed. This is a measure called collateral estoppel.  Not only did it not apply in this case, but it opened the case of LaVergne V Bryson back up revealing the issue of improper dismissal.  Keep in mind all the plaintiffs in this case are Pro se. The best the highest paid trained minds could come up with was to try to throw one of the plaintiffs off?

The sheer fact that we are all Pro se (that means we are NOT attorneys and do not have lawyers representing us), is NEWS… yes BIG NEWS. So, why is this not being reported when celebrity relationships and corruption are in the headlines EVERY day?  It is not that media does not know. You can look at my TL on twitter  @AJC4Others and see how many times I have contacted them all about this case. I often place this case on something THEY tweeted!


For those who say 6000 members in the House is too many, I offer this. One elected person authorized by the Constitution speaking on the behalf of millions but selling that voice to the highest bidder is NOT working.  It does not work in the Oval Office, head of the FBI, head of the Unions, or in the case of any department head.  The constituency is supposed to remove those who sell their influence. That is how it is designed to work. The limit placed on the size of their constituency is painstakingly designed to limit the power of one person. No one state can run the country, especially not now. 

In the light of felony election fraud there is not a single member of Congress who is not guilty of the most egregious offence possible in public office. They violated the public trust and undermined the very process which makes ELECTING a President LEGAL and binding.  ALL incumbents are guilty of that. Any State could have challenged the election results through their representation in the Senate. You want to support a Senator? Ask them. Ask them why no member of the Senate or the House of Representatives called for an official investigation to rigging the election. The Rigging by the DNC, which the DNC admitted it in court and claimed it was their right to do so as a private organization.

Why are we bombarded with the narrative that Russia influenced the election by Facebook ads when Facebook filtered most anti-Hillary content and censored accounts which did not support her?  Why is Facebook is not being investigated? Why is Google is not being investigated in its role in manipulating search results? This is what 6000 new members in the House of Representatives will fix. These new members can, and will call for and conduct investigations WITH OUTCOMES that will lock up criminals, those taking bribes, and lock up their cronies. Do you remember that 3 day Government shutdown? Their lawyers got a 30-day extension from it. They are running out of time and excuses.

For those who don't get it, think it will make things worse, or have made their living from selling influence it does not matter what you think. What matters is this is ALREADY LAW.  It is already law. We all know ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ask any judge.

This 6000 plus membership will be comprised of US. For the first time in modern history we will have real representation.  Elected office will no longer be a family heirloom to be passed to offspring and college pals. It is time to return ethics, honor, service, and our voices back to where they belong.  We must spread the word of this because they will distract the public and spin this so many ways you won’t know what to do… or believe.

There is no need for all these Representatives to even live in Washington. Many companies and the Federal government have employees who work from home. Secure connections exist and work. It is why breaking a secure net, taking data from a secure net, and altering a secure net is a CRIME.  We have the technology and resources to govern this country so that AMERICA is GREAT for us all.  The time is now and it is OUR TIME.

I am Allen J Cannon,

I am Anti-Corruption

If you still don’t believe here is the transcript from LaVergne Vs Bryson.: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o_SyoXQWvb1bO02XPD0aGWU_gaN5Rro5/view?usp=sharing

Friday, March 9, 2018

MAGA redefined,,,


This is an except from the Email I received from ColorofChange.org.  It reads as follows, and I quote:

"Dear Allen. 
Our election process is threatened by our election records not being backed up with paper ballots. Our digital ballots could potentially be hacked leaving our system vulnerable.History has shown us election outcomes coming under question leads to Black voter freedom being attacked and restricted. When Trump distracted from questions about his election he did so by accusing Black communities of voter fraud and launching a commission designed to substantiate his lie and restrict Black people's freedom to vote1.
The "Secure Elections Act" has been introduced by a bipartisan group of Senators led by Democratic Senator Kamala Harris." ...end quote

*******Now lets get to it shall we.......
Let me begin by addressing the identity politics of the email. How did they know I am black? Did they know or assume that I am not a multicultural person who identifies with more than one race?  I am so beyond race, political party, gender, or sexual orientation than many could ever fathom.  I have but one criteria for office. ARE YOU HONEST? That is the question I focus my independent research upon.

There is not one single member of Congress that is honest. Well, how could you say that Mr. Cannon, you may ask? Fact: The very first case to enter court on CONGRESS voting to give the FCC the power to change the internet rules known as Net Neutrality was LaVergne Vs US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.  The case was not founded on the FCC vote which got so much press…. The night before the vote. This case was in court in April of last year. It challenges the constitutionality of the House of Representatives (HOR) to transfer that authority to the FCC.

To understand what this means one may need to actually read the case. In short, the argument is based on Article The First.  Article the first is the very first proposed amendment to the US Constitution. Some history behind this proposed amendment can be found here:
Article The First was actually designed to ensure that the House of Representatives always provided the people with access to the law-making process. It is why we have a census. The Census determines the size of the HOR. This amendment was thought to have not been ratified. We have proved that it has in fact been ratified.  At this very moment all 50 Attorney Generals of EVERY State in the United States is opposing this REVELATION. I call it revelation because it is law already. It has been law for over 100 years. This revelation is also being opposed by every member of the HOR, the Senate and the President.  It is five regular guys against all of them. Do you understand what that means?  Five citizens vs the finest legal minds in the nation from the best schools, wealthiest families, and generations of being in office.

It is us five guys, against all of the people who are supposed to represent ALL OF US! We are up against people who swore an oath to represent us. They are running for office right now. All of the HOR is up for re-election. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM.  They are asking for your vote while keeping you in the dark about this case. Every State legislator is expecting you  to vote for them not knowing this FACT.

So, what does this case mean? It means, the HOR legally does not have a quorum to pass ANY LAW. Votes to carry must have 50% plus ONE. The HOR is supposed to have over 6000 members. Had they followed the CONSTITUTION we would not have this GIGANTIC DISPARITY. This means that gerrymandering and lobbyists lose their hold on our government. The hold is broken by the constitutional stipulation limiting each HOR member to 50 thousand constituents.

So how do I know every state legislator knows? That is because we had to serve them all.  The daunting task of service is what makes a challenge of this magnitude almost imposible. WE, however completed it. We have also staved off each of their motions to get the case thrown out. They are trying to delay this.  They literally used the 3 day government shutdown for a month extension. We just regular folks took two weeks to respond to them and have requested summary judgment in the case.  The research is sound and has been authenticated by the most renown law schools, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Oxford.
The work was published before we went to trial. Here is the link to the source documents: https://twitter.com/AJC4others/status/938841527601762306  

Please keep in mind we are just five regular guys using whatever we have at our disposal against all of their might and influence. They know we are using social media tagging this case to ads, and spreading it in DMs, private messages, emails, all social media platforms.  This is truly important for all voters and their families to know.  I am not sure how you feel but I am not voting for anyone who knows this exists and wouldn’t tell me.  This is not something we made up. This is not some new law we are fighting to create. THIS IS LAW NOW!

How many times have regular folk heard a judge say ignorance of the law is no excuse? How many issues have we the people begged Congress to fix? How many public schools have closed? How many conflicts of interests have we witnessed by bankers being placed in government? How many times have we seen banks defraud customers and nothing happened? How many voters spent their whole lives in a party and were purged from their party rolls illegally? How many times have you gone to an elected official and won against big money interests?

I can only implore you everyday up to election day, to remove them all. The biggest reason to vote out all incumbents is because they are actively betraying you right NOW! 

Today we live in a world where the few decide you have no rights and pipelines for oil and prisons are more important than clean lead-free drinking water, sacred land, good food, and medical care.  The few have decided that they are the only ones OUR money should make comfortable. It is our money. It is our government. They have not represented our interests in so long we think its normal? Is that acceptable?

It is not acceptable that every day millions of courtrooms are handing out sentences based on law when the LAW which guarantees we have a say in what laws are made and or changed is NOT BEING FOLLOWED. I am not sure how many ways I can put this. As cynical as I am, I have hope for us all. I have faith in us all.  

I know, as they also know the more people know about this it ends their reign. We can’t depend on people to not vote down the line.  We must elect based on the content character. They select their elite based on compliance to the system they have illegally and unethically kept in place. They have co-opted the message of change and made it appear hopeless. We may never have the opportunity to do anything greater than this. Share this news.  The media won’t cover it.  I have challenged members of Congress to discuss this. NONE will.  No tv station will.  We are all we got…. Sometimes to get something done you have to do it yourself. We are doing our best. Thank you for your attention.

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption

Thursday, March 8, 2018

ELECTION of the ENTIRE House of Representatives happens in 2018


2018 is the year of We The People.

Do you know that in a few short months, the entire US House of Representatives can be replaced? This is a mid-term election which means this will still be the 115th Congress. 
One may ask, where do members of Congress come from? Are they hatched, bred, or created in a lab? Strangely enough the answer may be more sinister than you ever thought possible.  Some are groomed, trained, and paid to become members of Congress. If you have a favorite Member of Congress keep that name in your head as you read what happened from the perspective of duty, obligation, law, oath of office and the CONSTITUTION.  

So where do these  people come from? It usually starts at the top or in a local party meeting.  Those with the favor of party bosses get the line and they usually anticipate everyone just voting down the line.  As we learned in the last Presidential primary, they do have a backup plan when their pick runs into some strong competition.  But, all of that is about to change.

For the first time in our nation’s recent history we have issues too numerous for any of US to NOT have a problem with CONGRESS. Congress can’t approve the biggest military budget in the history of mankind and talk of how dangerous guns are. Congress can’t talk of tax cuts when the richest people in the world tripled their wealth without lifting a finger.  Congress can’t talk of transparency with all the lies and lies about lies and investigations and conflicts of interest it currently has. Congress can’t speak of fair elections, meddling, hacking, bribery, and media interference when they let a tainted election which violated their duty and oath of office by not protecting the constituents or the Constitution. Not one asked that the felony election fraud admitted to by the DNC (in FEDERAL COURT) be investigated. Still have that favorite in mind?

In every company in America people get fired. People reach mandatory retirement ages.  Some companies even have bylaws that require reorganization meetings. But, All companies have bylaws and incorporation papers. The DNC violated its own charter, bylaws, and ethical standards of conduct. If that was not bad enough… CONGRESS failed in its Fiduciary duty as it said nothing of ALL the taxpayers in America being defrauded by the DNC rigging the primary. Still holding on to that favorite?

Here is what we know as fact. The DNC testified in court that it did in fact rig the primary for Hillary.  The DNC further claim that as a private organization it was within its RIGHTS to select a nominee.  The DNC also claims rigging an election is protected under FREDOM OF SPEECH.

My belief is that NO member of Congress should return. No member of Congress stood up for the US Constitution. Every single Taxpayer and entity was defrauded by the DNC because dollars are not marked in denominations of Democrat or Republican. Therefore, State and Federal money used to pay for RIGGED primaries constitutes FRAUD.

No matter what party you are in, claim, ride, and swear allegiance to know this.  Not ONE member of Congress stood to protect the voting process. NOT ONE! Not one stood to protect the verifiable outcome of the most important election our nation has for what may be the most powerful seat in the world. NOT ONE.  It is impossible to legally impeach the President at this time.  Those who speak of it already know it is legally impossible.  They still fan flames of hate while warming themselves by the fire.  How and why it is legally impossible to bring articles of impeachment against The President will be covered in my next article. Some of you may already know why it is legally impossible but… ALL OF CONGRESS knows why it is a legal impossibility.  Mark your calendars.  2018 is the year We The People get a brand new CONGRESS.

As you start to campaign, recommend, support, donate time and money I ask one simple question. NAME THE ONE MEMBER OF CONGRESS WHO DEFENDED THE  PROPER ELECTION PROCESS, The CONSTITUTION, The CONSTITUENTS, THE PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER and dealt with the rigging of the election as admitted to by the DNC? Still got that favorite in your head?

I am Allen J Cannon and I am Anti-Corruption.